product design

How to Use Design Thinking: IT Problem Solving Guide

When leading a tech company, you can expect to face complex issues that will tend to fall outside the “strictly technical” umbrella. When these issues arise, you’ll need to be able to think outside the box. The typical challenges that solution companies see involve systems, whether data sharing, working with varying technical architectures, or dealing with IT that is difficult to control, as seen with cloud computing. 

While we expect to run into challenges when working with technology, additional situations arise when running an IT service business. A client may have a particularly complex issue or your technicians may be struggling with the given timeline of a project. In these cases, every team will have methodologies they fall back on that can be useful. With that in mind, it must also be recognized that problem-solving doesn’t always happen from static approaches. 

Every team’s issues will be subjective and how to approach them is what we’re going to outline:

People, Process, Technology

Tech companies who have faced issues on an organizational level are likely aware of a popular response outlined as People, Process, and Technology (PPT). Brought to fruition during the 1960s and earning the name “the golden triangle”, PPT was designed to boost operational efficiency among employees. The premise behind this process is that it balances three crucial elements when dealing with a problem (the people, the process, and the technology). While using PPT, it is intended that those on the front line will rely on the companies' processes and technological resources to resolve issues. When it comes to a software company, most will employ this for IT management since these are the main elements at play.

In the modern day, however, the issues seen in the IT spectrum are heavily varied since companies and technology function much differently than they did 50 years ago. Some big contributors to this shift are the introduction of cloud computing, AI, and the internet which are automated systems with complex software. Traditional problem solving for technology (like that of PPT) tends to focus on task performance as opposed to dealing with the unknown.

Oh and there’s one more factor left out of the framework… Creativity. This is where the concept of design thinking came into play. It involves focusing on the stakeholders within an issue, the technological resources, what is required for the business to be successful, and then brainstorming solutions as a team to materialize an outcome. Noticeably, the framework of PPT is embedded within the concept, which gives it some level of familiarity for those utilizing it.

How Can We Use Design Thinking?

When you’re working in IT you can get used to implementing so much that creativity takes a back seat. The concept of design thinking can be thought of as a practice as well as an ideology. Similar to the “balanced triangle'' we saw in PPT, design thinking follows its outcome-driven phases. In his 2009 Ted Talk, Tim Brown, a popular designer from the UK and a connoisseur of design thinking describes the process of design as “balancing desirability with technical feasibility and economic viability”. 

There is an art form to traditional methods of design and they are not limited to artistic practice. Creativity is a tool meant to construct a resolution for the needs of any given situation. This is the framework that design thinking is based on. By tapping into creativity, you’ll avoid static development approaches. Though it is an intuitive concept, implementation is often where challenges are found. To get a better understanding, here’s a list of the phases involved in design thinking (in no particular order):

  • Empathize: Since this approach emphasizes the people, it is best to view the problem from the perspective of the end-user. This will allow leadership to detach from presumptions and focus on resolving from a neutral level. 

  • Define: Once you’ve empathized with the stakeholders and made an analysis you’ll now define what the clear issues are. Drafting a problem statement (Point of View) is a great way to do this as your considerations will, again, be from the user's perspective. For example “if we don’t do x,y, or z to mitigate this issue then we can expect this” or “the previous process keeps running into this wall, let's overcome that before anything else”. Simply put, remove assumptions and deeply consider the problem (define) then you can develop a solution. 

  • Ideate: Based on the knowledge you’ve gathered from the last two phases, you’ll now begin brainstorming. Since your perspective is in line with filling specific gaps that you’ve identified, there should be a variety of concepts on the table. From there, build on ideas to reach the desired outcome.

  • Prototype: Branching off of the ideate phase, you’ll now want to get hands-on with your solutions. This is done by developing a variety of samples of the product that can be tested at a low cost. From there, you’ll be ready to move on to the final phase. 

  • Test: After developing the prototype version of your solution, what's left is making sure it works. Running tests is how you mitigate risk by building on areas that will prevent future issues. 

IT Example

If you look at a software implementation process, when examining the needs of the customer, there’s a tendency to focus solely on the technology. What’s more important at that moment however is considering the need it’s being built to fill. This is when the phases of design thinking are useful. Using creativity to identify challenges and brainstorm methods to mitigate them for the end-user makes the software selection process much more efficient. Once the software is selected, the team will make the necessary changes and have the user run tests to ensure that it fills the recipient's needs. 

Everyday Examples

While we’ve focused on how to apply design thinking in IT, you should understand that this methodology has carry-over. Imagine you’re a mechanic and you’ve brought a car that the owner claims needs an oil change because there is a “knocking sound in the engine”. You can take the customer's word for it or dive deeper and find out that there is an issue with the spark plugs. 

You likely get the idea at this point, that design thinking is handling issues with care by doing the extra steps to ensure issues are resolved for good. Designers apply this in their work and it is what makes innovation so useful to people. It’s difficult to walk across all 50 states, so we made cars, trains, and planes. A machine needs more memory so we created RAM. The examples are endless.

Takeaway

Ideas aren’t created out of standard practices or strictly followed processes. Every idea is formed once someone’s mind is free to think. Design thinking is breaking the chains of capped potential by avoiding standardized reactions. Try this out with the little things first, start with the next time you find yourself in conflict by considering the situation from the other person's perspective. Detach and decide, notice how the outcome changes when you do so. 

Written By Ben Brown

We work with successful companies to increase their net profits using exceptional custom software solutions, contact us here to see how we can help your business grow!

 
 
 

3 Reasons Why Evolution is Better Than Revolution in Product Design

peshkovaadobestock-117667.jpeg

There is no doubt that the era of digitization brought numerous advantages for all types of businesses, but many challenges have also emerged. And for companies that want to succeed and be better than their competitors, these new challenges mark the difference between success and failure.

These challenges do not always involve a generalized change of the products or services of your company, sometimes the real challenge is to realize that your product only needs some improvements to be at the level of the expectations of your clients.

In this blog, I will write about the redesign options for a digital product, specifically the difference between an evolutionary and a revolutionary design. Moreover, I will give you some reasons why evolutionary design can sometimes be better for your business.

Evolutionary design

5d14013686e4be0df6df1771_old-and-New-Design-Mobile-Phone-on-white-background.jpeg

Evolutionary design is based on making changes to a product in order to have an updated design that increases the perceived quality. This type of redesign is highly recommended for brands that are well-positioned in the market. It is not a good decision that a brand that is recognized and also has good acceptance among customers, is subjected to a revolutionary design because it could run the risk of not being recognized by its own consumers.

Revolutionary design

wp-15864228164871220005340275020859.jpg

When it comes to a revolutionary design, the objective is to modify the original design practically in its entirety. This decision may be backed by an urgent need to revitalize a little-recognized product. Through a fresh and innovative design, a product that does not attract the attention of consumers can obtain greater freedom to change and show a more attractive image.

It is logical that both approaches have striking aspects. But, before making a decision, you must carry out an analysis of the objectives that you intend to achieve. As well as the time, resources and money that you are going to invest to obtain that long-awaited new design.

Why revolution design is not always the best decision for your business:

1.A makeover is not always the solution to brand problems

A renewed concept is not a guarantee that this time your brand will cause a positive impact among consumers. If the product presents problems in its functionality, there will not be striking fonts or colors that make consumers change their opinion.

2. Listen to your customers

listening-to-customers.jpg

Making a revolutionary design means making a significant change in the current design of any product. This is a commonly used practice for dealing with competition, but it doesn't mean that if your competitor revolutionized their product design, you should too.

Before carrying out any redesign of your product, you must first analyze your consumers, understand what attracts them to your product, and what makes them feel identified. Otherwise, you could confuse them and even lose them.

3. More money and more time

unsplash-image-X_fbh4Utwk4.jpg

When you make a revolutionary design you commit your brand to a pause period. It can take months for you to get the new design and its approval, time your clients don't have to wait. On the other hand, if the new design turns out to have some problems, you should invest more money and time to solve this situation. And possibly by that time, you have already affected the perception of customers about your brand.

On the other hand, an evolutionary design focuses on constantly improving a product. You do not have long waiting times for a totally different design because you gradually improve the existing design with strategic changes that provide a long-term benefit.

If you are looking for advice about which approach is better for your brand's current situation, please contact us, we are willing to help.